Audi 100 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 323, but torque is 7 NM more than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A6 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 100 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger. Audi 100 is 80 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 11 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 309 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | no data | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Audi 100 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |
