Audi 100 1990 vs Volvo S80 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 157 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 102 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 143 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.4 | |
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
Audi 100 is smaller. Audi 100 is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 100 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 480 litres | |
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 5600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 9.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |