Audi 100 1989 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Audi 100 engine produces 65 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Despite less power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi 100 is smaller. Audi 100 is 21 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 114 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. The Chrysler 300M may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 (by 1390 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |