Audi 100 1988 vs Mazda 626 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 165 HP | 61 - 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 265 NM | 121 - 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17 seconds | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 11.7 | 6.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, a Audi 100 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 1`066 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |