Audi 100 1988 vs Ford Sierra 1987

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 100
1988 - 1991
Ford Sierra
1987 - 1990
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi 100 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.9

Performance

Power: 69 - 165 HP67 - 150 HP
Torque: 123 - 265 NM119 - 229 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 17 seconds9.2 - 20 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 11.76.5 - 11.7
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Audi 100 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.51 m
Width: 1.81 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi 100 is 28 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 644 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1920 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`890~ 1`262
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12001600
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower price
Ford Sierra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv