Audi 100 1988 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Audi 100 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 300M is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler 300M can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 165 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 265 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 11.7 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi 100 is smaller. Audi 100 is 21 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 114 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. The Chrysler 300M may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 (by 1390 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |