Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 850 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 100
1991 - 1994
Volvo 850
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo 850 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 4.22.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 82 - 280 HP126 - 250 HP
Torque: 157 - 400 NM170 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 - 17.5 seconds6.8 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 13.26.0 - 11.1
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. On average, a Audi 100 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo 850.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.72 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres960 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1310 litres1580 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 570 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 850. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 850 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`041~ 1`924
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Volvo 850 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv