Audi 100 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 100
1991 - 1994
Mazda 323
1989 - 1995
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 4.21.3 - 1.8

Performance

Power: 82 - 280 HP56 - 106 HP
Torque: 157 - 400 NM99 - 151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 - 17.5 seconds8.8 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 13.25.9 - 9.2
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. On average, Audi 100 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.11 m
Width: 1.78 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.36 m
Audi 100 is larger.
Audi 100 is 68 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 11 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres309 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1310 litresno data
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity.
Audi 100 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`041~ 1`519
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv