Alfa Romeo 156 2003 vs Seat Toledo 2000

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2005
Seat Toledo
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP105 HP
Torque: 146 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 2 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.26.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 195 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1000 km on highway
770 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.44 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 and Seat Toledo are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 378 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Seat Toledo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Seat Toledo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv