Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs Volvo S40 2002

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2003
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP165 HP
Torque: 206 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds8.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 and Volvo S40 have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo 156 torque is 34 NM less than Volvo S40. Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.67.9
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway980 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Volvo S40 has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv