Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs Toyota Avensis 2003
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 129 HP | |
Torque: | 146 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Toyota Avensis. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Avensis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Alfa Romeo 156 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Alfa Romeo 147 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Avensis might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Alfa Romeo 156 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Avensis 2003 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Avensis 2003 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 156 is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |