Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs BMW 3 series 1991

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2000 - 2002
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 181 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 and BMW 3 series have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo 156 torque is 9 NM less than BMW 3 series. Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.79.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.2 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 156 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway970 km on highway
610 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo 156) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo SpiderInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo 156 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.43 m
Width: 1.74 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Alfa Romeo 156 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1200 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`760
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Alfa Romeo 156 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Alfa Romeo 156, so Alfa Romeo 156 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002200
Rating in user reviews: 6.2/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv