Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP136 HP
Torque: 255 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 31 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 25 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1400 km on highway
940 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.47 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 4 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres440 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 60 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`875
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10002000
Rating in user reviews: 6.7/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv