Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1992

 
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Alfa Romeo 164
1992 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Alfa Romeo 156) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Alfa Romeo 164) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 105 HP146 HP
Torque: 255 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 164 is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 41 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 164, but torque is 68 NM more than Alfa Romeo 164. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.88.2
The Alfa Romeo 156 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 156 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1070 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.56 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Alfa Romeo 156 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Alfa Romeo 156 is 13 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 164, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres505 litres
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 164.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 164, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 164 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv