Alfa Romeo 156 2003 vs Volvo V50 2004

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2006
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 175 HP136 HP
Torque: 385 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 39 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volvo V50. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.75.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1190 km on highway
910 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.51 m
Width: 1.74 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1180 litres1307 litres
Volvo V50 has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 57 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V50 (by 127 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`895 kg1`850 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 16001800
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv