Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2003
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2005
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 165 HP165 HP
Torque: 206 NM206 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds8.2 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 2002 and Alfa Romeo 156 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.6
Alfa Romeo 156 2002 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 2002 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway950 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 250'000 km250'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.44 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 2002 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres378 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1180 litresno data
Alfa Romeo 156 2002 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons:
    Alfa Romeo 156 has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv