Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 55 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1180 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 156 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.6/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |