Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2000 - 2002
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP192 HP
Torque: 222 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 seconds7.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 2 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 23 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.79.2
Real fuel consumption: 11.3 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 375 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 530 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway880 km on highway
550 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1180 litres1345 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 75 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 165 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8702`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.6/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv