Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2002

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2000 - 2000
BMW 3 series
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP115 HP
Torque: 304 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds11 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 21 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 39 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.85.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1280 km on highway
880 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1180 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 75 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.6/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv