Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 34 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 145, Alfa Romeo Spider, Alfa Romeo GTV | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is larger. Alfa Romeo 156 is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1180 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.6/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |