Alfa Romeo 156 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 250 HP | 115 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 146 - 385 NM | 146 - 385 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | 6.3 - 11.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 12.1 | 6.0 - 12.3 | |
Alfa Romeo 156 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 156 2002. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 2003 is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 156 2003 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156 2002. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`793 | ~ 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
| |