Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs Nissan Almera 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 3.2 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 250 HP | 90 - 114 HP | |
Torque: | 146 - 305 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 12.1 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
Alfa Romeo 156 petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 4 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 393 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 156 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 156 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`808 | ~ 1`734 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Almera has
| |