Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs Seat Toledo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 190 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 304 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.5 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 11.9 | 5.0 - 9.3 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`795 | ~ 1`349 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |