Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs BMW 3 series 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 190 HP | 90 - 193 HP | |
Torque: | 144 - 304 NM | 141 - 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.5 seconds | 7.3 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 11.9 | 6.5 - 10.0 | |
Alfa Romeo 156 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Alfa Romeo 156 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 156 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`795 | ~ 1`755 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |