Alfa Romeo 156 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2000 - 2003
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Alfa Romeo 156 is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 105 - 190 HP115 - 231 HP
Torque: 144 - 304 NM175 - 410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 11 seconds6.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 12.05.7 - 11.0
On average, the Alfa Romeo 156 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 3 series. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1180 litres1345 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 75 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 165 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`837~ 2`062
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.6/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv