Volvo XC40 2020 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo XC40 engine produces 21 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volvo XC40 is larger. Volvo XC40 is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1281 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC40 has 116 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Volvo XC40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC40 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo XC40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |