Volvo XC40 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC40 engine produces 127 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 137 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC40 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC40 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo XC40 is larger. Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1336 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Volvo XC40 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |