Volvo XC40 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019

 
Volvo XC40
2017 - 2020
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP180 HP
Torque: 300 NM224 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds8.8 seconds
Volvo XC40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo XC40 engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 76 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.95.2
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo XC40 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway1100 km on highway
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.40 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.65 m1.56 m
Volvo XC40 is larger.
Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1406 litres
Volvo XC40 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo XC40 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2201`965
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 40021 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC40 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv