Volvo XC40 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC40 engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Volvo XC40 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Volvo XC40 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Volvo XC40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`943 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC40 scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Kadjar is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |