Volvo XC40 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019

 
Volvo XC40
2017 - 2020
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP116 HP
Torque: 350 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds12.6 seconds
Volvo XC40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo XC40 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.0
Volvo XC40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1060 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.40 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.65 m1.56 m
Volvo XC40 is larger.
Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1406 litres
Volvo XC40 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo XC40 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight: 2`180 kg1`969 kg
Net weight:1`671 kg1`371 kg
Load capacity:509 kg598 kg
Volvo XC40 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 40021 200
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-30 has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv