Volvo XC40 2017 vs Kia XCeed 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Volvo XC40 engine produces 14 HP more power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Kia XCeed. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC40 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.50 m | |
Volvo XC40 is larger. Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Kia XCeed, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 426 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1378 litres | |
Volvo XC40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC40 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Volvo XC40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 26 800 | 21 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |