Volvo XC40 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volvo XC40 and Jaguar E-Pace have the same engine power, but Volvo XC40 torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Volvo XC40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC40 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC40 has 774 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Volvo XC40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.06 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |