Volvo XC40 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volvo XC40 and Jaguar E-Pace have the same engine power, but Volvo XC40 torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Volvo XC40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC40 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Volvo XC40 is 3 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.06 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`671 kg | 1`843 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 509 kg | 557 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |