Volvo XC40 2017 vs BMW X1 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC40 engine produces 81 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC40 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2015: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
| BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volvo XC40 is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Volvo XC40 has 45 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW X1 has
| |