Volvo XC40 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 408 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 660 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 10.4 seconds | 7.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.1 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
Volvo XC40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Volvo XC40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 171 - 211 mm (6.7 - 8.3 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volvo XC40 is larger. Volvo XC40 is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1336 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC40 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Volvo XC40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Volvo XC40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`282 | ~ 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC40 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo XC40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |