Volvo XC40 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC40 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar F-Pace can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC40 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 408 HP | 163 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 660 NM | 365 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 10.4 seconds | 4.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.1 | 4.9 - 11.9 | |
|
Volvo XC40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Pace. On average, Volvo XC40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 171 - 211 mm (6.7 - 8.3 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volvo XC40 is smaller. Volvo XC40 is 31 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1336 litres | 650 litres | |
| Volvo XC40 has 190 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC40 (by 686 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Volvo XC40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`282 | ~ 2`464 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |