Volvo V90 2016 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Volvo V90) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volkswagen Passat), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 80 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, but torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2380 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo V90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo V90 is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V90 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Passat (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volvo V90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Passat is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |