Volvo V90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 130 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.1 | 5.0 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2380 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V90 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`327 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |