Volvo V90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Volvo V90) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Skoda Superb), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 130 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.1 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2380 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo V90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`327 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |