Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Volvo V90 engine produces 7 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.1 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Volvo V90 is 4 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1800 litres | |
| Volvo V90 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |