Volvo V90 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Volvo V90 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 11.1 | |
|
The Volvo 960 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 960 has
| |