Volvo V90 1997 vs Volkswagen Passat 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 267 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 114 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 5.5 | |
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 885 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Passat) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
Volvo V90 is larger, but lower. Volvo V90 is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 602 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
Volvo V90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V90 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`875 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |