Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Opel Omega
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP211 HP
Torque: 260 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds10 seconds
Volvo V90 engine produces 31 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.711.3
Volvo V90 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway880 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.90 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volvo V90 is smaller.
Volvo V90 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1800 litres
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1002`280
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22001200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv