Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1997

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.9 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP211 HP
Torque: 260 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.3 seconds
Volvo V90 engine produces 31 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.011.2
Volvo V90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway900 km on highway
Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.82 m
Width: 1.75 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volvo V90 is 4 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 602 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1800 litres
Volvo V90 has 62 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1002`280
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 22001000
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv