Volvo V90 1997 vs BMW 5 series 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V90 engine produces 38 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.5 | |
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
Volvo V90 is 14 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 602 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 910 litres | |
Volvo V90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V90 has 142 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V90 (by 792 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`180 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |