Volvo V90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
| Volvo V90 engine produces 48 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`307 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |