Volvo V90 2016 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V90 engine produces 60 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V90 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | no data | |
| Volvo V90 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |