Volvo V90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V90 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1430 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`996 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 404 kg | 620 kg | |
| Volvo V90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 53 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |