Volvo V90 2016 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 31 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, but torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V90 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mercedes CLS engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo V90 is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Volvo V90 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes CLS (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |