Volvo V90 2016 vs Subaru Outback 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo V90) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Outback) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo V90 engine produces 70 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 25 NM more than Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 9.0 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volvo V90 is larger, but lower. Volvo V90 is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 2143 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 617 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`380 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |