Volvo V90 2016 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014

 
Volvo V90
2016 - 2020
Volkswagen Passat
2014 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP240 HP
Torque: 400 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds6.3 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V90 engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V90 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1360 km on highway1400 km on highway
860 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.94 m4.77 m
Width: 1.89 m1.83 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Volvo V90 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo V90 is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 560 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1526 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo V90 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`3802`310
Safety:
Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Passat is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 23 60014 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv