Volvo V90 2016 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V90 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Volvo V90 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 7 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 488 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Volvo V90 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`906 kg | 1`601 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 404 kg | 729 kg | |
| Volvo V90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Ford Mondeo. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |